scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

SCSH status and future

To: scsh-users@scsh.net
Subject: SCSH status and future
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:02:40 +0100
List-id: <scsh-users.list-id.scsh.net>
Hi,

Until a few months ago, I was a quite happy user of scsh. (I'm also
the main maintainer of the Debian package of scsh.) Any script I was
doing (that didn't have to be embedded in a Makefile) for my own use
was done in scsh. Both long term scripts (e.g. backup) or throw-away
(just typed on the command line, executed once and never saved). I was
dreaming of scsh every time I was forced to write a serious bash (or
even worse - POSIX /bin/sh) script.

But in a short time, this all changed. The machine I backup _to_ is
now an amd64 machine. I cannot use scsh for my backup scripts now. My
main desktop is also a amd64 machine. I cannot use scsh for my
throw-away execute-once scripts. And I don't know of a good
replacement. (I removed features from my backup script to shoehorn it
into guile + a compatibility layer.)

Unless scsh gets portability to 64 bits machines on the middle term, I
think it will slowly fade into oblivion. It would be a shame. Anybody
wants to make an scsh (_with_ the process notation) on top of another
scheme than the old scheme48 it is now based on?

-- 
Lionel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>