scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: possible licensing issues with some scsh source files

To: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Subject: Re: possible licensing issues with some scsh source files
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lmamane-scsh-list-2003-10-29@conuropsis.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 23:44:28 +0100
Cc: scsh@zurich.csail.mit.edu, joostvb-scsh-list-2003-10-29@conuropsis.org
Sender: Lionel Elie Mamane <master@tofu.mamane.lu>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 02:05:48PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:22:01PM +0100, Martin Gasbichler wrote:
>> Lionel Elie Mamane <lmamane-scsh-list-2003-10-29@conuropsis.org> writes:

>>>> How do other scheme implementations such as guile deal with this
>>>> issue? Did they reimplement the whole reference implementation of
>>>> the SRFIs?

>> I have checked this in the meantime: they have implemented the SRFIs
>> in C...

> While guile has re-implemented SRFI's 13 and 14, guile indeed
> includes (a derivative of) the reference implementation of SRFI 19,
> but the SRFI copyright notice was stripped.

Having said that, I must say that it is the policy of the GNU project
to include code in its official projects only if the copyright is
assigned to the FSF, so in this particular case, the original author
(Will Fitzgerald) probably has signed copyright over to the FSF.

-- 
Lionel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>