| To: | scsh@zurich.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ekko.scm: meant to be exec()'d? |
| From: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:08:49 +0200 |
lmamane-scsh-list-2003-08-19@ad1810.com writes: > Hi, > > Is scsh/ekko.scm meant to be exec()'d? I ask, because it is not > installed executable by the Makefile, so its "#!" header is useless. > > If it is meant to be exec()'d, then it should be installed with > INSTALL_PROGRAM, not INSTALL_DATA. Else, I suggest to remove the #! > header, so as not to confuse people. > I think ekko.scm is just a small example file which could be removed from the distribution. -- Martin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: scsh 0.6.4 errors (Linux 2.4.20): Channel closed: 0 0, Martin Gasbichler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Makefile and pre-compiled packages, Martin Gasbichler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ekko.scm: meant to be exec()'d?, lmamane-scsh-list-2003-07-25 |
| Next by Thread: | running s scsh script with changed user and group id, Sven . Hartrumpf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |