scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is scsh way slower than Guile ... or am I doing something wrong?

To: scsh-news@zurich.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Is scsh way slower than Guile ... or am I doing something wrong?
From: Eric Hanchrow <offby1@blarg.net>
Date: 24 Apr 2003 18:25:21 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Sperber [Mr Preprocessor]
>>>>> <sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

    Michael> The reason is almost certainly READ-LINE which is written
    Michael> in (byte-code-interpreted) Scheme in scsh, whereas I
    Michael> assume Guile has a C version.

I was slowly coming to that conclusion myself.  I tried the below
alternative, and it's about twice as fast, but that's still kind of
slow.  I think the quote at the end of this message (which was
attached automatically and at random; lucky coincidence) ought to put
me in the right frame of mind; scsh still promises to save programmer
time.

    (let ((start (time)))
      (let ((big-string (call-with-input-file "/tmp/x" port->string))
            (parser (infix-splitter (rx #\newline))))

        ;; if you comment this out, the time taken will drop drastically.
        ;; This makes me wonder if I/O is actually fast, and it's just
        ;; regexp execution that's slow.
        (parser big-string)

        (let ((stop (time)))
          (format #t "Time: ~A seconds ~%" (- stop start))))
      (values))

-- 
Wasting programmer time is the true inefficiency, not wasting machine time.
        -- Paul Graham

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>