| To: | scsh-news@zurich.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Usage of Shivers' SRE regular expression notation |
| From: | lord@emf.emf.net (Tom Lord) |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 06:44:19 -0000 |
| Organization: | emf.net -- Quality Internet Access. (510) 704-2929 (Voice) |
Tom> Finally, let me add that a little bit of Emacs bigotry. I
Tom> navigate and edit my SREs using emacs s-exp navigation and edit
Tom> commands.
Emacs navigates group nesting in string regexps just fine.
No it can't. (Consider regexps containing character sets like
"[]abc]".)
A lot of what we agree about could be summed up as "economy of
concepts and mechanisms". Given the idea of an s-exp, and a mechanism
for manipulating them, it just plain "works out nicely" to use that
idea and those mechanisms for every problem they're isomorphic too.
But contrary to that, another point we both agree about, is that
infix, punctuation-heavy, domain-specific syntaxes have their place.
-t
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Usage of Shivers' SRE regular expression notation, Alex Shinn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Usage of Shivers' SRE regular expression notation, Michel Schinz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Usage of Shivers' SRE regular expression notation, Alex Shinn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Matrix op speaks. Computer programmers needed to build matrix., Ulrich Schoebel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |