David Rush <email@example.com> writes:
> Yoann Padioleau <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > David Rush <email@example.com> writes:
> > > Yoann Padioleau <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > > I am not sure call/cc was in scheme from the beginning.
> > >
> > > Full TCO *was* and that is *much* more important.
> > TCO = ???
> Tail Call Optimization. A key feature of Scheme, which (along with
> lexical scoping) enables pretty much the entire rest of the language
> spec. Do you actually understand Scheme *at all*?
Yes i understand scheme, it is not because i dont know
all the acronym that i dont know about tail call optimisation.
This is because i know scheme, ml, haskell, c, ... that i can say
"the only truly advantage of scheme over other langage is its
powerful macro system".
> > > > Sure, because they dont know what they are talking about.
> > > PKB
> > pkb = ?
> Pot. Kettle. Black.
> From the proverbial "that's the pot calling the kettle `black'".
i am not english, so dont understand this proverb, but that is not really
> david rush
Yoann Padioleau, INSA de Rennes, France,
Opinions expressed here are only mine. Je n'écris qu'à titre personnel.
**____ Get Free. Be Smart. Simply use Linux and Free Software. ____**