Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> writes:
> "Anton van Straaten" <email@example.com> writes:
> > However, I think you're right that the SCSH FAQ doesn't quite
> > succeed in communicating to someone who is comfortable with
> > traditional scripting languages, why they should throw out all the
> > arbitrary syntax they've worked so hard to memorize, and instead
> > learn something that's more cleanly designed for extensibility and
> > power. Part of the problem is that fully describing and contrasting
> > these capabilities to those of the "scripting languages" would
> > require an entire series of articles.
> That said, this part of the FAQ could certainly be rewritten. It was
> written in 1996, and it shows.
Oh, ok, i understand more now :)
> So, I'll do my homework and rewrite it before the FAQ gets posted next
> month (on the 13th). We'll see if I manage to produce something less
Yoann Padioleau, INSA de Rennes, France,
Opinions expressed here are only mine. Je n'écris qu'à titre personnel.
**____ Get Free. Be Smart. Simply use Linux and Free Software. ____**