scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is s48_extract_double actually useful?

To: Felix Klock <felix_klock_ii@mac.com>
Subject: Re: Is s48_extract_double actually useful?
From: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:30:26 +0100
Cc: scsh-news@zurich.ai.mit.edu
>>>>> "Felix" == Felix Klock <felix_klock_ii@mac.com> writes:

[snip]
Felix> Has anyone else run into this problem?  I'm going to go ahead and hack 
Felix> up the source in the meantime to try to work around this (I'll probably 
Felix> attempt to figure out how to convert an extended-number into a double 
Felix> from within the code for s48_extract_double) but I'd like to know if 
Felix> there's better way someone else has already come up with.

I think I used the whole S48 FFI -- except for the part you mention...

Does 

,open floatnums 

change anything?

Felix> p.s. do people find this list a better place to pose scheme48 specific 
Felix> questions (as opposed to comp.lang.scheme)?  Or would it be better for 
Felix> me to be asking there instead?  I know this is really supposed to be a 
Felix> newsgroup about scsh (and I am a happy user of scsh!) but I figured 
Felix> since scsh is a layer on top of scheme48, some people were probably 
Felix> well-versed with both systems....

Scheme 48 has its own mailing lists, I recommend posting your report
to the bugs list. See the README file for details about the lists.

-- 
Martin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>