>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bourguignon <too.much.spam@example.com> writes:
Pascal> -------------- ------------------ ------------------
------------------
Pascal> emacs scsh clisp
Pascal> -------------- ------------------ ------------------
------------------
Pascal> Running a small compiled script ten times:
Pascal> Real Time: 0m10.822s
0m6.603s
Pascal> User Time: 0m03.250s
0m1.400s
Pascal> System Time: 0m00.110s
0m0.440s
Why do you omit scsh here? I don't expect scsh to compete with the
others here but using dumped heap images is a huge time saver for
bigger scripts.
Pascal> -------------- ------------------ ------------------
------------------
Pascal> Documentation: Good Bad Fair
Pascal> (in-line doc, (no in-line doc. (minimal in-line
Pascal> (describe-function, reference split doc (describe,
Pascal> describe-variable, between several apropos),
Pascal> apropos, info,...) docs (scsh, Common-Lisp
Ref.)
Pascal> easily accessible scheme)).
Pascal> on-line full
Pascal> reference, etc).
Scsh comes with a extensive manual in various formats (PS, PDF, HTML)
and a constantly growing manual for the S48 part. I don't think the
lack of integration with the rest of the system makes this a "bad
documentation".
--
Martin
|