scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts.

To: pjb@informatimago.com
Subject: Re: Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts.
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:12:43 +0200
Cc: scsh-news@zurich.ai.mit.edu
>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bourguignon <too.much.spam@example.com> writes:

Pascal> But I've  been surprised  to see  that it was  slower and  bigger than
Pascal> emacs or clisp.

It's just something we haven't paid particular attention to recently,
since it didn't seem very important.  We were more intent on providing
functionality.

Space usage mostly has to do with the simple-mindedness of the garbage
collector as well as the fact that you're loading a full development
system.  We are working on the GC, but it'll be a while until that
stabilizes sufficiently.  I agree we need to do something about
startup speed; that's also closely related to the GC issue.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>