| To: | scsh-news@zurich.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts. |
| From: | sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Aug 2002 10:44:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | pjb@informatimago.com |
>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bourguignon <too.much.spam@example.com> writes: Pascal> Language: ELisp / CommonLisp Scheme Common Lisp Pascal> Scripting: Best set of file Better set of Pascal> editing functions. scripting (process Pascal> management) functions. Pascal> Libraries: Full range of Few existing lib. Full range of Pascal> libraries & appl. or script/appl. libraries & appl. Pascal> -------------- ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ I would claim that scsh comes with a full range of "libraries & appl." It would help if you were more specific about what you're missing. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts., Pascal Bourguignon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts., Pascal Bourguignon |
| Previous by Thread: | Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts., Pascal Bourguignon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Comparison between emacs, clisp, scsh for scripts., Pascal Bourguignon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |