| To: | sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: scsh vs. time(), mktime(), and errno |
| From: | Noah Friedman <friedman@splode.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2001 06:11:06 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | scsh@zurich.ai.mit.edu |
| Reply-to: | Noah Friedman <friedman@splode.com> |
>> Every system call that I'm aware of either has a special return value which >> indicates whether it failed (which is usually -1), or modifies an argument >> appropriately, or has some other kind of indication of failure ... > >One I'm aware of is the BSD getpriority(2) which returns a value which >can legitimately be -1 on a successful return. Wow, I should have remembered that. I stand corrected. But I still think my proposed redefinition of scheme_time will work. :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: scsh vs. time(), mktime(), and errno, Bill Sommerfeld |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: scsh vs. time(), mktime(), and errno, Bill Sommerfeld |
| Next by Thread: | Re: scsh vs. time(), mktime(), and errno, Dave Love |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |