| To: | sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"? |
| From: | Noah Friedman <friedman@splode.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Apr 1998 02:14:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
| Cc: | bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu |
| Reply-to: | Noah Friedman <friedman@splode.com> |
>Subject says all. I know Emacs behaves that way, but the XEmacs >developers are wondering just the same. > >It seems "./" would be a more reasonable choice, no? (I would >personally have it raise an error, but that's just me ...) Unix file name semantics being what they are, and since file-name-as-directory interprets other arguments relative to the current working directory, I think "./" is probably the correct thing for it to do. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"?, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"?, Richard Stallman |
| Previous by Thread: | Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"?, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"?, Richard Stallman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |