| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"? |
| From: | sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) |
| Date: | 14 Apr 1998 09:17:01 +0200 |
Subject says all. I know Emacs behaves that way, but the XEmacs developers are wondering just the same. It seems "./" would be a more reasonable choice, no? (I would personally have it raise an error, but that's just me ...) -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>] Re: Is the `scsh' licence DFSG compliant? Please advise., Karl M. Hegbloom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"?, Noah Friedman |
| Previous by Thread: | [Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>] Re: Is the `scsh' licence DFSG compliant? Please advise., Karl M. Hegbloom |
| Next by Thread: | Rationale for (file-name-as-directory "") => "/"?, Noah Friedman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |