| To: | scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ) |
| From: | "Peter G. Martin" <peterm@zeta.org.au> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 May 1997 16:18:49 +1000 |
| Organization: | Digital Equipment Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, USA |
| Reply-to: | peterm@zeta.org.au |
Chris Bitmead uid(x22068) wrote: > Don't be so silly. The IRS has had your DNA and complete quantum state > on file for quite a while now. They already know how you're going to > fudge your 2003 tax return deductions based on complex mathematical > models. I hope and fondly assume they're as good at that as the economists who presumably use much the same complex mathematical models... (probably stored in a certain OOPS database, Chris...) -- Peter G. Martin, Contract Tech Writer peterm@zeta.org.au martin@shl.dec.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux works fine, Richard Crew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Andrew Bromage |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |