Bug in static.scm (version 0.5), Iver Odin Kvello, 1997/04/27

• Bug in static.scm (version 0.5), Brian D . Carlstrom, 1997/04/27

Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Leif Nixon, 1997/04/25

• Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Brian D . Carlstrom, 1997/04/26
  • Re: Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Steven Jenkins, 1997/04/26
• Re: Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Scott Draves, 1997/04/27
  • Re: Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/28

time/date bugs in 0.5.0, Leif Nixon, 1997/04/25

• Re: time/date bugs in 0.5.0, Leif Nixon, 1997/04/24

Bug?, Tim Bradshaw, 1997/04/23

• Re: Bug?, Sean Doran, 1997/04/29
• Re: Bug?, Steven Jenkins, 1997/04/23

Static images broken again in 0.5.0, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/23

• Static images broken again in 0.5.0, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/23

0.5 release omissions, Franklin Chen, 1997/04/22

• 0.5 release omissions, Brian D . Carlstrom, 1997/04/22
• Linux works fine, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/22

CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger, 1997/04/22

• Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Francois-Rene Rideau, 1997/04/22
  • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger, 1997/04/22
  • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Bengt Kleberg, 1997/04/23
  • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Marco Antoniotti, 1997/04/25
  • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Marco Antoniotti, 1997/04/26
    • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Bengt Kleberg, 1997/04/24
    • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Marc Wachowitz, 1997/04/24
    • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger, 1997/04/25
    • Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/25

[ANNOUNCE] Scheme Shell 0.5.0 Released, Brian D . Carlstrom, 1997/04/22

• 0.5, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/22
  • Re: 0.5, Sean Doran, 1997/04/29
    • Re: 0.5, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/29
• scsh & kali, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/30
  • Re: scsh & kali, Sean Doran, 1997/04/30

Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Marc Wachowitz, 1997/04/20

• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/21
  • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/29
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jacques GARRIGUE, 1997/04/21
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/22
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Steven D. Majewski, 1997/04/23
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), ben, 1997/04/24
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Scott Fahlman, 1997/04/24
  • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 1997/04/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Noah Friedman, 1997/04/25
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jacques GARRIGUE, 1997/04/25
• Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Steven D. Majewski, 1997/04/29

New regexp substitution functions, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/19

• New regexp substitution functions, Alan Bawden, 1997/04/19
  • Re: New regexp substitution functions, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/19
• Re: New regexp substitution functions, Michael Beach, 1997/04/19
  • Re: New regexp substitution functions, Jin S. Choi, 1997/04/19
• Re: New regexp substitution functions, Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/25

globbing and shell syntax, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/19

• Re: globbing and shell syntax, Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/19

Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Olin Shivers, 1997/04/18

• Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/18
  • Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Brian D . Carlstrom, 1997/04/19
• Scheme shell interactive syntax, Gord Matzigkeit, 1997/04/25
• Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Chris Patti, 1997/04/29
• Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), William Paul Vrotney, 1997/04/18
• Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), ozan s. yigit, 1997/04/20
• Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/24

Tcl & Scheme, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/18

• Re: Tcl & Scheme, ozan s. yigit, 1997/04/18
• Scheme disutility, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/19
  • Re: Scheme disutility, Martin Cracauer, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Scheme disutility, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/20
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Scheme disutility, Per Bothner, 1997/04/23
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Scheme disutility, aaron_watters, 1997/04/29
• Re: Scheme disutility, Richard Coleman, 1997/04/20
  • Re: Scheme disutility, giacomo boffi, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Scheme disutility, Richard Cobbe, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Scheme disutility, Tad McClellan, 1997/04/30
• Re: Scheme disutility, Brian D. Carlstrom, 1997/04/20
• Re: Tcl & Scheme, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/21
• Re: Tcl & Scheme, Bengt Kleberg, 1997/04/21
• Re: Scheme disutility, Russ McManus, 1997/04/22
  • Message not available
    • Re: Scheme disutility, P. Srinivas, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Scheme disutility, Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Scheme disutility, Marc Wachowitz, 1997/04/22
• Re: Tcl & Scheme, Harvey J. Stein, 1997/04/28

Time/date problem, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/18

• Time/date problem, Alan Bawden, 1997/04/18
• Re: Time/date problem, Adam Sah, 1997/04/19
• Re: Time/date problem, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/19
• Re: Time/date problem, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/23
  • Message not available
    • Re: Time/date problem, Noah Friedman, 1997/04/23
• Re: Time/date problem, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/23
• Re: Time/date problem, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/28

Scripting vs. Systems, Daniel Wang, 1997/04/17

• Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Graham Matthews, 1997/04/18
• Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Daniel Wang, 1997/04/19
  • Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Marc Wachowitz, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Stefan Wille, 1997/04/21
• Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Daniel Wang, 1997/04/21
  • static vs. dynamic typing (was Re: Scripting vs. Systems), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/22
  • Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Paul Prescod, 1997/04/22

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), cosc19z5@bayou.uh.edu, 1997/04/10

• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Steve Cassidy, 1997/04/10
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 1997/04/10
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bill House, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), David Hanley, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Andrew P. Mullhaupt, 1997/04/12
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bert Robbins, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/16
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Andreas Eder, 1997/04/11
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Mike Haertel, 1997/04/10
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jete Software Inc., 1997/04/11
  • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/12
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Ousterhout, 1997/04/12
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bryan Oakley, 1997/04/11
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Shen, 1997/04/12
    • Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., rajt, 1997/04/19
    • Re: Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., Paul Wilson, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., Kelly Murray, 1997/04/21
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin, 1997/04/12
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/14
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Gary D. Duzan, 1997/04/15
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), rajt, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 1997/04/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith, 1997/04/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/17
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael L. Siemon, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith, 1997/04/17
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Evan Kirshenbaum, 1997/04/18
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael L. Siemon, 1997/04/18
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alex Williams, 1997/04/19
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bror Johansson, 1997/04/17
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/17
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Prescod, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Robert Virding, 1997/04/18
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), lvirden, 1997/04/18
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/18
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Thomas, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/13
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin, 1997/04/14
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/14
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), David Combs, 1997/04/17
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jon S Anthony, 1997/04/15
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/21
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jonathan Guthrie, 1997/04/17
  • Strings as a uniform representation & tcl, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Strings as a uniform representation & tcl, Charles Lin, 1997/04/17
    • Re: Strings as a uniform representation & tcl, Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/19
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Gary D. Duzan, 1997/04/21
• Message not available
  • Re: Correct timelines [was: Reply to Ousterhout's reply ], David Combs, 1997/04/17
• Message not available
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/23
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Prescod, 1997/04/22
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), cosc19z5@bayou.uh.edu, 1997/04/12
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Ousterhout, 1997/04/13
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/15
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), ozan s. yigit, 1997/04/17
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), giacomo boffi, 1997/04/18
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Abigail, 1997/04/19
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jacques GARRIGUE, 1997/04/14
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Brad Spencer, 1997/04/15
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/18
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin, 1997/04/19
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/19
    • Strings everywhere (was Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply), Frederic BONNET, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/30
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith, 1997/04/20
• Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), rajt, 1997/04/19
  • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/25

Patch for `%set-unix-signal-handler!', Alan Bawden, 1997/04/05

• Alan, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/08

SIGPIPE, Alan Bawden, 1997/04/05

• SIGPIPE bug, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/08

Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Daniel Wang, 1997/04/02

• Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Richard Coleman, 1997/04/03
• Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/06
  • Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Bill House, 1997/04/04
    • Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, lvirden, 1997/04/04
    • Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Bill House, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, lvirden, 1997/04/06
• Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 1997/04/07
• Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 1997/04/08
• Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Jim Wise, 1997/04/10
• Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/13

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead, 1997/04/02

• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Joe English, 1997/04/03
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Stefan Harms, 1997/04/03
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/03
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, John Ousterhout, 1997/04/06
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/06
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jack Jansen, 1997/04/06
    • TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Mark Sterin, 1997/04/06
    • Re: TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Hume Smith, 1997/04/07
    • Re: TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Cameron Laird, 1997/04/07
    • Re: TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Jack Jansen, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill House, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael David WINIKOFF, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fergus Henderson, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cameron Laird, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mark Chu-Carroll, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jeffrey Hobbs, 1997/04/08
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Rainer Joswig, 1997/04/08
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Steffen Beyer, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Trimble, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 1997/04/13
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 1997/04/14
    • Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/07
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 1997/04/09
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Fergus Henderson, 1997/04/09
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 1997/04/09
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Fredrik Lundh, 1997/04/09
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Ben Black, 1997/04/09
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Ben Black, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Ousterhout, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/10
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), William Clodius, 1997/04/10
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/11
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Dan Haskell, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/13
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), William Clodius, 1997/04/17
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bill House, 1997/04/10
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bill House, 1997/04/15
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 1997/04/10
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Rainer Joswig, 1997/04/11
    • LISP as the ultimate fractal language (Was: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...)), Mike Meyer, 1997/04/12
    • Re: LISP as the ultimate fractal language (Was: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...)), Henry Baker, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Mark A Harrison, 1997/04/13
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 1997/04/13
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Tom Christiansen, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), George Herbert, 1997/04/17
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/11
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Karl Lehenbauer, 1997/04/12
    • Message not available
    • What's wrong with Lisp? (WAS: Reply to Ousterhout's...), M. Prasad, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), James Logajan, 1997/04/13
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Prescod, 1997/04/10
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/12
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Frederic BONNET, 1997/04/15
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jason Trenouth, 1997/04/09
    • Message not available
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/09
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Smiljan Grmek, 1997/04/09
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael D. Kersey, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jim Blandy, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 1997/04/20
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Kagalenko, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Rainer Joswig, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Rainer Joswig, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mark A Harrison, 1997/04/08
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/08
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Martin Cracauer, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael Kagalenko, 1997/04/11
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jesper Buus Nielsen, 1997/04/10
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jay Krell, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cameron Laird, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Hume Smith, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, George J. Carrette, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/16
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mike Meyer, 1997/04/17
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl (Rexx-Info, Rony . Flatscher, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mike Meyer, 1997/04/19
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Universal scripting interfaces (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/21
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jim Blandy, 1997/04/24
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Arturo P\rez, 1997/04/30
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Christopher Eltschka, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, L.J. Wischik, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Nat Pryce, 1997/04/29
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/04
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill House, 1997/04/04
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 1997/04/05
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill House, 1997/04/05
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/08
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill Eldridge, 1997/04/02
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 1997/04/02
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 1997/04/02
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Franklin Chen, 1997/04/03
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead, 1997/04/03
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 1997/04/03
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead, 1997/04/03
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 1997/04/03
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Scott Schwartz, 1997/04/04
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/04
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donald Syme, 1997/04/05
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Noah Friedman, 1997/04/05
  • Ousterhout is partially right (was: Re: Ousterhout lost the plot), Koen Claessen, 1997/04/07
    • Re: Ousterhout is partially right (was: Re: Ousterhout lost the plot), Graham Matthews, 1997/04/09
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 1997/04/05
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 1997/04/04
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 1997/04/08
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 1997/04/08
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham C. Hughes, 1997/04/06
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 1997/04/09
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, James Lee, 1997/04/06
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fritz Heinrichmeyer, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Carl Zmola, 1997/04/08
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Christopher Hylands, 1997/04/07
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ioi Lam, 1997/04/11
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, cano_jonathan, 1997/04/07
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/09
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Daniel Wang, 1997/04/08
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jesper Buus Nielsen, 1997/04/10
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Robert Virding, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Poindexter, 1997/04/11
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jim Blandy, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bryan Oakley, 1997/04/12
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Martin Cracauer, 1997/04/19
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, George Herbert, 1997/04/22
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Adam Sah, 1997/04/09
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donn Cave, 1997/04/09
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Russ McManus, 1997/04/09
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Russ McManus, 1997/04/09
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Stefan Monnier, 1997/04/10
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 1997/04/10
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham C. Hughes, 1997/04/11
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, cosc19z5@bayou.uh.edu, 1997/04/12
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alexey Goldin, 1997/04/15
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 1997/04/15
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, lvirden, 1997/04/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Hume Smith, 1997/04/17
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham C. Hughes, 1997/04/24
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Will Duquette, 1997/04/16
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Niels M\vller, 1997/04/30
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/16
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alaric B. Williams, 1997/04/18
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham Matthews, 1997/04/17
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Russ McManus, 1997/04/17
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/18
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Kelly Murray, 1997/04/21
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, James Logajan, 1997/04/19
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 1997/04/19
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Wilson, 1997/04/19
    • Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), John Ousterhout, 1997/04/19
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), John Nagle, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Cyber Surfer, 1997/04/26
    • Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jim Blandy, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 1997/04/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Mark A Harrison, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Christopher J. Vogt, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Lyman S. Taylor, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Matthew D. Healy, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 1997/04/26
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), M. Prasad, 1997/04/21
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ron Natalie, 1997/04/21
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 1997/04/22
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jason V. Robertson~, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jim Blandy, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), schaffer, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ray Dillinger, 1997/04/21
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ray Dillinger, 1997/04/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Rainer Joswig, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/21
    • Lisp is not the issue, Cimarron Taylor, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ben Hanson, 1997/04/22
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), David Hanley, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), William Clodius, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), M. Prasad, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fergus Henderson, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 1997/04/20
    • List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/29
    • Re: List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Henry Baker, 1997/04/29
    • Re: List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael Beach, 1997/04/20
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Brian Rogoff, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 1997/04/20
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 1997/04/21
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bjarne Stroustrup, 1997/04/25
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 1997/04/23
    • wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Thant Tessman, 1997/04/23
    • Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/23
    • Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), David Thornley, 1997/04/23
    • Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Thant Tessman, 1997/04/24
    • Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Ben Hanson, 1997/04/23
    • Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/25
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jon S Anthony, 1997/04/26
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/28
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Karl Lehenbauer, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Kelly Murray, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Henry Baker, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, tomlinson, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Andrew P. Mullhaupt, 1997/04/24
    • Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Peter Ludemann, 1997/04/24
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (nuh-uh!), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/25
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/25
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Fergus Henderson, 1997/04/26
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Thant Tessman, 1997/04/26
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum, 1997/04/26
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Fergus Henderson, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Tony Finch, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Jacques GARRIGUE, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Henry Baker, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jon S Anthony, 1997/04/25
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Andrew Koenig, 1997/04/25
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, schaffer, 1997/04/26
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 1997/04/29
    • Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Istvan.Simon, 1997/04/25
    • Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/25
    • Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), ozan s. yigit, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Matthias Blume, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Henry Baker, 1997/04/27
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Thomas Beale, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Andrew Bromage, 1997/04/30
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 1997/04/30
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Wolfgang Grieskamp, 1997/04/30
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Christopher Eltschka, 1997/04/30
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Lennart Augustsson, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), schaffer, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Wolfgang Grieskamp, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Barry Margolin, 1997/04/29
    • BITMAPS & Backgrounds, Mohammed Shoaib, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Paul Wilson, 1997/04/29
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Matthias Blume, 1997/04/28
    • Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 1997/04/29
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, David Combs, 1997/04/24
  • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard Cobbe, 1997/04/28
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Will Duquette, 1997/04/19
  • Message not available
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mark A Harrison, 1997/04/22
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Henry Baker, 1997/04/22
    • Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with, Steven D. Majewski, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper], Thant Tessman, 1997/04/23
    • Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, SERRANO Manuel, 1997/04/24
    • Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with, Steven D. Majewski, 1997/04/24
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Will Duquette, 1997/04/22
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Peter Ludemann, 1997/04/22
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/23
• Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 1997/04/23

scsh mis-interacting with FreeBSD procfs??, Daniel Ortmann, 1997/04/01

• Re: scsh mis-interacting with FreeBSD procfs??, Steven Jenkins, 1997/04/01
• Re: scsh mis-interacting with FreeBSD procfs??, Faried Nawaz, 1997/04/08

INT signal and sleep, Daniel Ortmann, 1997/04/01

• Re: INT signal and sleep, Steven Jenkins, 1997/04/01

Date and time strangeness in scsh 0.4/SunOS 4.3.1_U1/SunOS 5.5, Leif Nixon, 1997/04/01

• Re: Date and time strangeness in scsh 0.4/SunOS 4.3.1_U1/SunOS 5.5, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/17

(user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Alan Bawden, 1997/04/01

• Re: (user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Steven Jenkins, 1997/04/01
  • (user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Alan Bawden, 1997/04/01
  • Random bugs, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/04
• Re: (user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Olin Shivers, 1997/04/04
  • dynload, Alan Bawden, 1997/04/04