| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading. |
| From: | kem@math.ufl.edu (Kelly Murray) |
| Date: | 21 Apr 1997 03:34:20 GMT |
| Organization: | Franz Inc. |
| Reply-to: | kem@franz.com |
> wilson@cs.utexas.edu (Paul Wilson): > Often the reason that Tcl seems like the right language for the job, > even one it's not designed for, is just that C is the wrong language > for the job. Excellent Observation. That pretty much sums up this whole Ousterhout's paper/TCL/Script/System topic! -Kelly Murray kem@franz.com P.S. Don't get me wrong, C is a great language! ...for implementing UNIX. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tcl & Scheme, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Kelly Murray |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., Paul Wilson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |