| To: | scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries |
| From: | sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) |
| Date: | 25 Apr 1997 08:43:14 +0200 |
| Organization: | Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut, Kakerlakenzuchtverein |
>>>>> "Ray" =3D=3D Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net> writes: Ray> So what do people want out of a module system or package system? Since this issue is a hard one, I suggest sticking with one of the available module systems. Scheme 48 and MzScheme come to mind. Both models are quite powerful. (First-class modules & interfaces ...) I tend to prefer the one in Scheme 48 since it's inherently non-intrusive. I also have some code to make it translate into more naive systems such as Bigloo's. -- Cheers =3D8-} Mike Friede, V=F6lkerverst=E4ndigung und =FCberhaupt blabla |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Object IDs are bad (nuh-uh!), Paul Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger |
| Next by Thread: | 0.5 release omissions, Franklin Chen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |