scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries

To: scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 25 Apr 1997 08:43:14 +0200
Organization: Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut, Kakerlakenzuchtverein
>>>>> "Ray" =3D=3D Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net> writes:

Ray> So what do people want out of a module system or package system?  

Since this issue is a hard one, I suggest sticking with one of the
available module systems.  Scheme 48 and MzScheme come to mind.  Both
models are quite powerful.  (First-class modules & interfaces ...)  I
tend to prefer the one in Scheme 48 since it's inherently
non-intrusive.  I also have some code to make it translate into more
naive systems such as Bigloo's.

-- 
Cheers =3D8-} Mike
Friede, V=F6lkerverst=E4ndigung und =FCberhaupt blabla

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>