| To: | scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper] |
| From: | Thant Tessman <thant@nospam.acm.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:28:29 -0700 |
| Organization: | meer.net |
Steven D. Majewski wrote: [...] > Another binary classification of computer languages is 'academic languages' > vs. 'toolkit languages' : [...] > But I think it's reasonable to say that Scheme, ML and Haskell -- > good picks for archetypal academic languages -- were all developed to > demonstrate the wide utility of a few powerful concepts. [...] I think ML was originally created specifically for writing theorem provers. So ML really started out as an academician's toolkit language. [...followups severely trimmed...] -thant |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug?, Steven Jenkins |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum |
| Previous by Thread: | Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with, Steven D. Majewski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, SERRANO Manuel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |