| To: | Chris.Bitmead@alcatel.com.au |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Time/date problem |
| From: | friedman@splode.com (Noah Friedman) |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 1997 02:37:49 -0700 |
| Cc: | scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
| Reply-to: | friedman@splode.com |
>Unix time is only meant to represent times after 1/1/70. On my system, time_t is a signed long, so what do negative (or very large) values represent? Other than -1, that is, which has an overloaded meaning because of system call conventions. If you say "garbage", I'm perfectly willing to believe you since that's usually what unix creates anyway... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Time/date problem, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Time/date problem, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Time/date problem, Olin Shivers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |