| To: | scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot) |
| From: | Ben Hanson <benh@cristie.co.uk> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:25:57 +0100 |
| Organization: | Cristie Electronics Ltd |
| Reply-to: | benh@cristie.co.uk |
John Ousterhout wrote: <SNIP> > This reinforces my claim that you should use different tools for different > tasks. This is also why I didn't mention Lisp in the paper. The things I > discussed in the white paper aren't the things that Lisp was designed for > or that it does best, so it isn't really fair to compare Lisp along those > dimensions. Lots of Irritating Spurious Parenthesis! Ben |
| Previous by Date: | Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Francois-Rene Rideau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 0.5, Olin Shivers |
| Previous by Thread: | Lisp is not the issue, Cimarron Taylor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |