scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot)

To: scsh-news@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot)
From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 07:39:27 GMT
Organization: nil
In article <335BB755.4B88@sonic.net>, Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net> wrote:
> Lisp machines may have had fabulous email systems, but how much good 
> does that do if the rest of the company is running on *another* email 
> system?  You want to buy lisp machines for every secretary and marketing 
> rep, just so they can all use the same email system?

Symbolics email system was compatible with every email system on the
arpanet, from unix boxes, to vms boxes, to dec-20 boxes, to pc's.  If Apollo
couldn't handle internet mail, then that was Apollo's problem, not the Lisp
Machines.

There were _some_ forms of mailer gateways, and in the later years, Symbolics
may very well have supported those, as well.

Oh by the way, I understand that all of the email sent to the White House
is being handled by a Lisp mail system that may very well be still running
on a Lisp Machine.  This project was being run out of MIT a year or two
ago.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>