| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Scripting vs. Systems |
| From: | danwang@nordica.CS.Princeton.EDU (Daniel Wang) |
| Date: | 20 Apr 1997 13:46:31 -0400 |
| Organization: | Princeton University Department of Computer Science |
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Wachowitz <mw@ipx2.rz.uni-mannheim.de> writes:
Marc> Daniel Wang (danwang@dynamic.CS.Princeton.EDU) wrote about Lisp:
>> This is why Lisp doesn't have a type system,
{stuff deleted}
Marc> What it doesn't have is _enforced_ statically decidable typing.
This is my definition of a type system. I should be shot for forgetting some
people have very different ideas of what a type system is. **Statically
decidable** typing is what make "type systems" a win as it catches errors at
compile time rather than at runtime.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jacques GARRIGUE |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Universal scripting interfaces (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Cyber Surfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Stefan Wille |
| Next by Thread: | static vs. dynamic typing (was Re: Scripting vs. Systems), Paul Wilson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |