| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot) |
| From: | joswig@lavielle.com (Rainer Joswig) |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 1997 22:08:01 +0200 |
| Organization: | Lavielle EDV Systemberatung GmbH & Co. |
In article <mpinkert-2004971242230001@fire.cc.gatech.edu>, mpinkert@cc.gatech.edu (Mike Pinkerton) wrote: > In article <hbaker-2004970914430001@10.0.2.1>, hbaker@netcom.com (Henry > Baker) wrote: > > >Two words: 'Lisp Machine'. > > Oh, yeah, and that was successful. I've got a friend with a Symbolics > machine he uses as a table. I got two in my office. Working. Daily. Cool. -- http://www.lavielle.com/~joswig/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ray Dillinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |