| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper |
| From: | Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no> |
| Date: | 20 Apr 1997 10:43:05 +0000 |
| Organization: | Naggum Software; +47 2295 0313; http://www.naggum.no |
* Paul Wilson | You could build a language based on Lisp/Scheme technology with a more | conventional syntax, and more redundant keywords. * Fergus Henderson | Sure, you could, but has anyone done it? yes. it's called DYLAN, for DYnamic LANguage. see comp.lang.dylan. #\Erik -- I'm no longer young enough to know everything. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Marc Wachowitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Scheme disutility, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fergus Henderson |
| Next by Thread: | List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Paul Wilson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |