| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper |
| From: | fjh@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) |
| Date: | 20 Apr 1997 01:47:24 GMT |
| Organization: | Comp Sci, University of Melbourne |
wilson@cs.utexas.edu (Paul Wilson) writes: >You could build a language based on >Lisp/Scheme technology with a more conventional syntax, >and more redundant keywords. Sure, you could, but has anyone done it? P.S. Follow-ups redirected to comp.lang.misc! I wish everyone else in this thread would do the same. -- Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), ozan s. yigit |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Paul Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), M. Prasad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |