| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...) |
| From: | hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker) |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Apr 1997 01:37:03 GMT |
| Organization: | nil |
In article <5j0gq5$jbi@mimsy.cs.umd.edu>, clin@cs.umd.edu (Charles Lin) wrote: > If one had to choose a single type for everything, a string is a > pretty good choice. Why not a number? How would you represent a > string with a number? Goedel showed how to represent everything with bignums. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, George J. Carrette |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |