| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | What's wrong with Lisp? (WAS: Reply to Ousterhout's...) |
| From: | "M. Prasad" <prasadm@not4u.polaroid.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:13:20 -0400 |
| Organization: | Polaroid |
| Reply-to: | prasadm@not4u.polaroid.com |
Steve Simmons wrote: > > Lisp has suffered (as has UNIX) by being grossly oversold by it's > proponents. On close examination, the proponents of both have Yes, that's *exactly* the problem with Lisp -- the fanatics who come with the language. Many of them who are barely competent to understand the concepts of Lisp but will go to war for it. By contrast, people using normal languages such as C/C++ can be counted on to give levelheaded opinions, because C/C++ are just tools. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Shen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Karl Lehenbauer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), James Logajan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |