Daniel Wang <danwang@salomon.CS.Princeton.EDU> skrev i artiklen
> After thinking about J. O's paper it looks like what he's really talking
> about is domain specific versus general purpose langauges.
> Where "scripting language" = Domain Specific
> and "systems language" = General Purpose.
> When he talks about "gluing" I think he's really ought to say putting
> together primitives designed by someone else that are at the right level
> abstraction. Read with this perspective some of what he says sounds a bit
> more resonable.
Unless of course his totally undocumented (as anything in the article was
that) comment about OO languages - not that I do not agree in his opinion,
but 'opinion' is an important word that JO confuses with the english word
(1) Or maybe he is confusing it with the sentence "I'm proud of me
concept". Taking into consideration the widespread use of Tcl - he should
be, but pride makes no trues.