| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...) |
| From: | jason@harlequin.co.uk (Jason Trenouth) |
| Date: | Wed, 09 Apr 1997 12:21:59 GMT |
| Organization: | The Harlequin Group. |
On 7 Apr 1997 04:47:45 -0500, wilson@cs.utexas.edu (Paul Wilson) wrote:
> One of the saddest things about Java is that it screams for an
> interactive implementation, rather than batch compilation. (Unlike
> C++, it's got enough checking by default to build an uncrashable
> interaction environment.)
>
> Once there are interactive implementations, the dichotomy between
> scripting and systems languages will be less obvious.
> (And if you made type declarations optional in scripts, that
> would go much further.)
Checkout Asymetrix SuperCede:
http://www.asymetrix.com/schome/
for some steps in this direction.
__Jason
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Fergus Henderson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Frederic BONNET |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |