Scsh Users List (date)

Scsh Users List (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

April 30, 1997

Problem with interactive signals in SunOS, Olin Shivers, 22:28
Fix for process-object problem, Olin Shivers, 20:37
Re: scsh & kali, Sean Doran, 20:27
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 19:18
Re: Scheme disutility, Tad McClellan, 19:07
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Christopher Eltschka, 17:28
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Donal K. Fellows, 17:18
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Wolfgang Grieskamp, 10:17
License terms for scsh?, Michael Beach, 08:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Niels M\vller, 07:47
scsh & kali, Olin Shivers, 07:37
Inappropriate posts, Olin Shivers, 07:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Arturo P\rez, 05:07
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Andrew Bromage, 03:47

April 29, 1997

BITMAPS & Backgrounds, Mohammed Shoaib, 22:47
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 21:27
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 21:07
Re: Scheme disutility, Richard Cobbe, 20:37
Re: List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Paul Wilson, 18:48
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Paul Wilson, 18:27
Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Chris Patti, 18:07
Re: List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Henry Baker, 17:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Nat Pryce, 16:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 16:17
Re: Scheme disutility, aaron_watters, 14:27
Re: Bug?, Sean Doran, 13:57
Re: 0.5, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 13:27
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Richard A. O'Keefe, 11:57
Re: 0.5, Sean Doran, 11:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 10:17
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Henry Baker, 06:27
List Syntax vs. Conventional Syntax (was Re: Ousterhout...), Paul Wilson, 05:47
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Steven D. Majewski, 03:18
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Wolfgang Grieskamp, 00:48
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Barry Margolin, 00:00

April 28, 1997

Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), schaffer, 23:58
Procobj bug; -i problem, Olin Shivers, 23:48
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, L.J. Wischik, 23:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Christopher Eltschka, 20:07
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Jacques GARRIGUE, 17:07
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 15:28
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Matthias Blume, 15:09
Re: Tcl & Scheme, Harvey J. Stein, 12:47
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Lennart Augustsson, 12:28
Re: Scheme disutility, giacomo boffi, 12:27
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Patrick Doyle, 11:17
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Thomas Beale, 09:27
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Paul Wilson, 09:27
Re: Time/date problem, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 08:49
Re: Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 08:37
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Paul Wilson, 08:27
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 04:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 04:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard Cobbe, 00:57

April 27, 1997

Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 21:37
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Tony Finch, 19:37
Bug in static.scm (version 0.5), Brian D . Carlstrom, 19:11
Bug in static.scm (version 0.5), Iver Odin Kvello, 18:25
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Henry Baker, 18:17
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Fergus Henderson, 15:57
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 14:57
Re: Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Scott Draves, 06:57
Re: Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Matthias Blume, 06:37
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), ozan s. yigit, 04:57

April 26, 1997

Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum, 18:07
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Thant Tessman, 17:57
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Marco Antoniotti, 13:57
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Fergus Henderson, 08:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Cyber Surfer, 08:07
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 04:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, schaffer, 03:48
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jon S Anthony, 02:37
Re: Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Steven Jenkins, 00:40
Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Brian D . Carlstrom, 00:33

April 25, 1997

Bug? Whats wrong with the symbol -i?, Leif Nixon, 23:57
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Marco Antoniotti, 21:57
Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 17:41
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Andrew Koenig, 15:57
Re: Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Andrew Koenig, 15:37
time/date bugs in 0.5.0, Leif Nixon, 12:57
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Noah Friedman, 12:48
Child pid mysteriously missing proc object, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 12:22
Object IDs are good ( was: Object IDs are bad ), Istvan.Simon, 12:17
Re: Object IDs are bad (nuh-uh!), Paul Wilson, 10:17
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 08:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 07:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Andrew Koenig, 07:27
Scheme shell interactive syntax, Gord Matzigkeit, 07:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bjarne Stroustrup, 06:27
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jacques GARRIGUE, 04:08
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jon S Anthony, 03:57
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger, 02:17
Re: New regexp substitution functions, Scott Schwartz, 00:37

April 24, 1997

Re: time/date bugs in 0.5.0, Leif Nixon, 23:17
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Marc Wachowitz, 22:57
Unix tools, small and large, Olin Shivers, 21:59
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 21:57
Help with a little test, Olin Shivers, 21:49
Object IDs are bad (was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Peter Ludemann, 21:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alaric B. Williams, 18:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, David Combs, 18:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 18:17
Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Thant Tessman, 17:23
Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Scott Schwartz, 16:47
Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with, Steven D. Majewski, 15:38
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), M. Prasad, 15:27
Strings everywhere (was Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply), Frederic BONNET, 14:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 14:17
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), William Clodius, 13:27
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Scott Fahlman, 09:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 09:07
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ray Dillinger, 08:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Andrew P. Mullhaupt, 07:17
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), ben, 05:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jim Blandy, 04:39
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham C. Hughes, 04:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 04:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl (Rexx-Info, Rony . Flatscher, 03:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, SERRANO Manuel, 01:57
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 01:48
Re: Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., Paul Wilson, 01:38
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Bengt Kleberg, 01:27

April 23, 1997

Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Ben Hanson, 23:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, tomlinson, 23:07
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), David Hanley, 22:48
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Henry Baker, 22:08
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), schaffer, 21:27
Re: Time/date problem, Olin Shivers, 21:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Kelly Murray, 21:07
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 19:37
Re: Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper], Thant Tessman, 19:27
Re: Bug?, Steven Jenkins, 19:20
Bug?, Tim Bradshaw, 18:48
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Mark A Harrison, 18:38
Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), David Thornley, 15:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 14:29
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Steven D. Majewski, 13:50
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), rajt, 13:37
Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum, 12:27
Re: Time/date problem, Noah Friedman, 11:37
Re: Time/date problem, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 11:19
Re: wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Erik Naggum, 11:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Karl Lehenbauer, 10:47
Why isn't -h working?, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 10:09
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 10:08
Static images broken again in 0.5.0, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 10:05
Static images broken again in 0.5.0, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 10:03
Designed vs. Jes' Grew [was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with, Steven D. Majewski, 09:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 09:17
wretched C++ (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Thant Tessman, 06:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 04:07
Re: Scheme disutility, Per Bothner, 01:47
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Bengt Kleberg, 01:18
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Prescod, 01:07

April 22, 1997

Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Matthew D. Healy, 23:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jim Blandy, 23:19
Re: Scheme disutility, Marc Wachowitz, 23:19
Patch for building Scsh 0.5.0 on Irix 5.3, Kevin Esler, 23:10
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jason V. Robertson~, 23:07
Linux works fine, Olin Shivers, 22:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Peter Ludemann, 22:07
Re: Scheme disutility, Alaric B. Williams, 20:38
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Scott Schwartz, 19:57
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger, 19:48
New scsh list without news, Brian D . Carlstrom, 19:41
0.5 release omissions, Brian D . Carlstrom, 19:35
0.5 release omissions, Franklin Chen, 18:23
0.5, Olin Shivers, 17:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ben Hanson, 13:37
Re: CFP: scheme standard libraries, Francois-Rene Rideau, 13:17
Lisp is not the issue, Cimarron Taylor, 12:37
CFP: scheme standard libraries, Ray Dillinger, 11:18
[ANNOUNCE] Scheme Shell 0.5.0 Released, Brian D . Carlstrom, 09:52
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 09:49
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Henry Baker, 09:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 08:57
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 08:47
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Christopher J. Vogt, 06:57
Re: Scheme disutility, P. Srinivas, 06:48
Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Marc Wachowitz, 05:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 05:27
Re: Scheme disutility, Russ McManus, 05:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, George Herbert, 03:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Lyman S. Taylor, 02:27
Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Paul Prescod, 02:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Prescod, 02:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Will Duquette, 00:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mark A Harrison, 00:37
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 00:26
static vs. dynamic typing (was Re: Scripting vs. Systems), Paul Wilson, 00:17

April 21, 1997

Re: Tcl & Scheme, Bengt Kleberg, 22:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Gary D. Duzan, 21:17
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ray Dillinger, 20:57
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Ron Natalie, 20:47
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), M. Prasad, 20:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 19:17
Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Stefan Wille, 13:27
Re: Universal scripting interfaces (Was: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Cyber Surfer, 12:47
Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Daniel Wang, 10:57
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jacques GARRIGUE, 09:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 08:07
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 06:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Kelly Murray, 05:57
Re: Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., Kelly Murray, 05:37
Re: Tcl & Scheme, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 02:27
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 01:17

April 20, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 22:53
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Rainer Joswig, 22:47
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Henry Baker, 22:17
Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Jim Blandy, 21:47
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Erik Naggum, 21:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith, 20:57
Re: Scheme disutility, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 15:38
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 12:47
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Marc Wachowitz, 10:47
Re: Scheme disutility, Martin Cracauer, 09:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael Beach, 08:48
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), John Nagle, 06:38
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Paul Wilson, 05:23
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Scott Schwartz, 05:17
Re: Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), Paul Wilson, 04:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fergus Henderson, 04:08
Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), ozan s. yigit, 01:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 01:19
Re: Scheme disutility, Brian D. Carlstrom, 01:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Brian Rogoff, 01:07
Invasion of the TCL weenies., Alan Bawden, 00:50
Re: Scheme disutility, Richard Coleman, 00:17

April 19, 1997

Lisp is neither (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot), John Ousterhout, 23:52
Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Daniel Wang, 23:47
Re: Time/date problem, Olin Shivers, 23:17
Re: globbing and shell syntax, Alaric B. Williams, 21:37
Ousterhout's paper: well worth reading., rajt, 20:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), rajt, 20:27
more secondary arg parsing, Jim Blandy, 14:15
bug in secondary arg parser, Jim Blandy, 13:55
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Wilson, 11:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Martin Cracauer, 10:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin, 10:01
Re: Strings as a uniform representation & tcl, Alaric B. Williams, 09:59
Re: Time/date problem, Adam Sah, 09:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Will Duquette, 09:55
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, James Logajan, 09:53
Re: New regexp substitution functions, Jin S. Choi, 09:52
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Abigail, 09:37
Re: New regexp substitution functions, Olin Shivers, 09:17
Re: New regexp substitution functions, Michael Beach, 08:59
New regexp substitution functions, Alan Bawden, 08:14
New regexp substitution functions, Olin Shivers, 06:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mike Meyer, 03:10
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 03:08
globbing and shell syntax, Olin Shivers, 02:57
Time/Date problem in Unix, Olin Shivers, 02:38
Scheme disutility, Olin Shivers, 02:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alex Williams, 01:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 00:27
Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Brian D . Carlstrom, 00:11

April 18, 1997

Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Alaric B. Williams, 23:48
Re: Tcl & Scheme, ozan s. yigit, 23:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), lvirden, 20:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alaric B. Williams, 19:50
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 19:38
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alaric B. Williams, 19:27
Re: Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), William Paul Vrotney, 15:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Robert Virding, 14:18
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), giacomo boffi, 11:47
Shell syntax and Scheme (Reply to Chris Bitmead), Olin Shivers, 10:37
Re: Scripting vs. Systems, Graham Matthews, 06:47
Time/date problem, Alan Bawden, 06:20
Tcl & Scheme, Olin Shivers, 06:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael L. Siemon, 04:52
Time/date problem, Olin Shivers, 04:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 04:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Evan Kirshenbaum, 02:08

April 17, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jonathan Guthrie, 23:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), William Clodius, 20:08
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Hume Smith, 19:18
Re: Strings as a uniform representation & tcl, Charles Lin, 19:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mike Meyer, 18:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), ozan s. yigit, 15:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Russ McManus, 15:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), George Herbert, 14:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), David Combs, 13:57
Re: Correct timelines [was: Reply to Ousterhout's reply ], David Combs, 13:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 12:27
Scripting vs. Systems, Daniel Wang, 11:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith, 09:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Chris Bitmead uid(x22068), 09:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bror Johansson, 08:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham Matthews, 05:07
Re: Date and time strangeness in scsh 0.4/SunOS 4.3.1_U1/SunOS 5.5, Olin Shivers, 04:37

April 16, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 23:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Hume Smith, 21:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Richard A. O'Keefe, 20:51
Strings as a uniform representation & tcl, Olin Shivers, 20:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alaric B. Williams, 19:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Will Duquette, 18:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 18:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael L. Siemon, 12:38
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 12:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jay Krell, 11:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 09:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 07:18
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Richard A. O'Keefe, 07:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 05:48
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Tom Christiansen, 05:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 05:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 04:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, George J. Carrette, 03:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, lvirden, 01:57

April 15, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 23:06
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alexey Goldin, 22:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bill House, 22:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Frederic BONNET, 21:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 16:48
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Brad Spencer, 16:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Gary D. Duzan, 05:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jon S Anthony, 02:57

April 14, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Donal K. Fellows, 18:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 13:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 04:38
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin, 04:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jacques GARRIGUE, 03:57

April 13, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Ousterhout, 23:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 20:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 15:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 14:47
Scsh (a Unix Scheme shell) FAQ, Michel Schinz, 13:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), James Logajan, 09:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 08:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Mark A Harrison, 01:37
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Scott Schwartz, 00:17

April 12, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Thomas, 22:08
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Karl Lehenbauer, 21:47
Re: LISP as the ultimate fractal language (Was: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...)), Henry Baker, 20:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Trimble, 19:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bryan Oakley, 18:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Andrew P. Mullhaupt, 18:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 15:50
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Charles Lin, 15:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Alaric B. Williams, 15:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 11:19
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), David Hanley, 11:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 09:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Ousterhout, 04:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 03:47
What's wrong with Lisp? (WAS: Reply to Ousterhout's...), M. Prasad, 03:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Shen, 02:38
LISP as the ultimate fractal language (Was: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...)), Mike Meyer, 02:27
delete-file, delete-directory & delete-filesys-object, Alan Bawden, 02:22
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), cosc19z5@bayou.uh.edu, 01:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, cosc19z5@bayou.uh.edu, 01:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jim Blandy, 00:33

April 11, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael Kagalenko, 22:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Poindexter, 22:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bryan Oakley, 21:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 19:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 18:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 17:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fritz Heinrichmeyer, 16:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Cyber Surfer, 15:18
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Andrew Koenig, 15:08
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Robert Virding, 14:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham C. Hughes, 12:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Rainer Joswig, 11:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Dan Haskell, 10:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ioi Lam, 10:19
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Andreas Eder, 10:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Martin Cracauer, 09:38
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jete Software Inc., 09:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 04:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 02:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bert Robbins, 00:17

April 10, 1997

Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), William Clodius, 22:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Prescod, 22:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 22:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jesper Buus Nielsen, 22:08
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jesper Buus Nielsen, 21:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Mike Haertel, 21:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 20:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Rainer Joswig, 20:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 20:08
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), M. Prasad, 19:57
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bill House, 19:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Bill House, 19:27
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Jim Wise, 14:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Rainer Joswig, 11:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), John Ousterhout, 09:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Kagalenko, 07:17
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Steve Cassidy, 06:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jim Blandy, 04:11
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael D. Kersey, 03:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Ben Black, 03:35
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Stefan Monnier, 02:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), cosc19z5@bayou.uh.edu, 02:07
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 01:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Erik Naggum, 01:37

April 09, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 23:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 21:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 21:27
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Ben Black, 21:08
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Fredrik Lundh, 20:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donn Cave, 19:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Smiljan Grmek, 19:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Russ McManus, 18:48
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Russ McManus, 17:48
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Adam Sah, 17:37
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Henry Baker, 17:20
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Jason Trenouth, 17:18
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Fergus Henderson, 17:07
Re: Ousterhout is partially right (was: Re: Ousterhout lost the plot), Graham Matthews, 12:47
Re: Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Graham Matthews, 12:27
scsh redefinitions of R4RS Scheme functions, Olin Shivers, 05:57

April 08, 1997

SIGPIPE bug, Olin Shivers, 23:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Rainer Joswig, 22:37
Alan, Olin Shivers, 20:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Daniel Wang, 19:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 16:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 14:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Richard A. O'Keefe, 14:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 13:17
Re: scsh mis-interacting with FreeBSD procfs??, Faried Nawaz, 06:57
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 02:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jeffrey Hobbs, 01:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mark A Harrison, 00:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Carl Zmola, 00:17

April 07, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, cano_jonathan, 23:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Tom Christiansen, 22:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Mark Chu-Carroll, 20:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 17:07
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Shriram Krishnamurthi, 14:27
Re: TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Jack Jansen, 14:07
Reply to Ousterhout's reply (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl ...), Paul Wilson, 13:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cameron Laird, 12:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Steffen Beyer, 12:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Hume Smith, 09:37
Re: TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Cameron Laird, 06:18
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Fergus Henderson, 06:07
Re: TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Hume Smith, 05:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cameron Laird, 04:57
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Bill House, 04:37
Ousterhout is partially right (was: Re: Ousterhout lost the plot), Koen Claessen, 04:17
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 03:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael David WINIKOFF, 03:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill House, 03:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Christopher Hylands, 00:17

April 06, 1997

TCL & interface definitions (was Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper), Mark Sterin, 19:28
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, James Lee, 15:39
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Graham C. Hughes, 15:38
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Jack Jansen, 14:28
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor], 11:47
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, John Ousterhout, 09:58
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Scott Schwartz, 06:18
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, lvirden, 04:58
markup v0.6 released, Scott Draves, 01:07

April 05, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Thant Tessman, 12:57
Patch for `%set-unix-signal-handler!', Alan Bawden, 05:21
open-{in,out}put-file redefined..., Alan Bawden, 05:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Noah Friedman, 04:08
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donald Syme, 03:18
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill House, 03:07
SIGPIPE, Alan Bawden, 02:02
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 01:17

April 04, 1997

dynload, Alan Bawden, 23:31
Re: (user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Olin Shivers, 23:07
Random bugs, Olin Shivers, 22:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Donal K. Fellows, 20:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill House, 19:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Cyber Surfer, 16:07
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, lvirden, 14:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Paul Prescod, 12:27
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Bill House, 05:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Scott Schwartz, 05:17

April 03, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Alaric B. Williams, 22:37
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Richard Coleman, 10:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 07:28
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead, 07:24
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 07:09
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Stefan Harms, 07:07
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Joe English, 05:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead, 03:27
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Franklin Chen, 00:08

April 02, 1997

Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Ben Black, 20:41
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Erik Naggum, 19:37
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Bill Eldridge, 19:07
Re: Ousterhout article on scripting applies to scheme, Daniel Wang, 11:57
Re: Ousterhout and Tcl lost the plot with latest paper, Chris Bitmead, 10:07

April 01, 1997

(user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Alan Bawden, 21:58
Re: INT signal and sleep, Steven Jenkins, 17:15
Re: (user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Steven Jenkins, 16:55
Re: scsh mis-interacting with FreeBSD procfs??, Steven Jenkins, 16:36
scsh mis-interacting with FreeBSD procfs??, Daniel Ortmann, 16:26
INT signal and sleep, Daniel Ortmann, 16:15
Date and time strangeness in scsh 0.4/SunOS 4.3.1_U1/SunOS 5.5, Leif Nixon, 14:37
(user-info "UnKnOwN") => Segmentation fault, Alan Bawden, 04:18
Re: set-file-group buglet, Olin Shivers, 01:47