| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Regexp notation |
| From: | "Jesper Buus Nielsen" <buus@daimi.aau.dk> |
| Date: | 16 Jan 1997 18:53:42 GMT |
| Organization: | ~Microsoft |
Fernando Pereira wrote: [snip] > algorithm). My experience building various text and speech-processing > applications using full regular algebra is that the worst case can often > be avoided, and that people often give up in advance intimidated by the > worst case before they examine the problem closely enough to know whether > it could be solved with the best current techniques, which are much more > sophisticated than those in standard textbooks (even converting a regexp > to a DFA can be done *much* better than what one can find in any textbook > I know, and techniques such as failure functions or lazy automata > algorithms are much less well-known than they deserve to be). Could you start making them well-known by pointing me to some paper/book on the subject. I'm about to implement a text-processing application and would be glad for the refs. /Jesper |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Regexp notation, Fernando Pereira |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Regexp notation, Fernando Pereira |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Regexp notation, Mike Haertel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Regexp notation, Joe English |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |