| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: transcendental functions broken? |
| From: | Sean Doran <smd@cesium.clock.org> |
| Date: | 13 Nov 1996 00:29:35 -0800 |
| Organization: | Secretariat of the USENET Cabal |
john@josquin.ucdavis.edu (John Gillespie) writes:
> Jin S. Choi (jsc@atype.COM) wrote:
>
> : What's wrong with this?
>
>
> : Scsh 0.4
> : > (log 3)
>
> .....
>
> I just verified the same problem on a Linux 2.0 system.
In more-packages.scm, uncomment floatnums in the
usual-features structure definition.
Sean.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: transcendental functions broken?, Rolf-Thomas Happe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [dU] Has anyone built scsh on Digital Unix?, Alex Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | transcendental functions broken?, Jin S. Choi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: transcendental functions broken?, John Gillespie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |