Re: fork vs. spawn

[Sean Doran <smd@chops.icp.net>]

Dave Mason <dmason@jupiter.scs.ryerson.ca> writes:

> Spawn certainly should be more portable than fork.  I know VMS only
> (really) has spawn, and I think one or more of the Microsoft
> ``Operating Systems'' only has spawn too.

Of course, the CORRECT way to have scsh run on those
platforms is to port the moral equivalent of Eunice...  ;>

        Sean.