|Subject:||Re: fork vs. spawn|
|From:||Sean Doran <email@example.com>|
|Date:||13 Aug 1996 17:04:25 -0400|
Dave Mason <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > Spawn certainly should be more portable than fork. I know VMS only > (really) has spawn, and I think one or more of the Microsoft > ``Operating Systems'' only has spawn too. Of course, the CORRECT way to have scsh run on those platforms is to port the moral equivalent of Eunice... ;> Sean.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|