scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

programming languages vs. interactive command languages

To: scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: programming languages vs. interactive command languages
From: shivers@ai.mit.edu (Olin Shivers)
Date: 10 Jan 1996 20:57:35 -0500
Organization: Artificial Intelligence Lab, MIT
Reply-to: shivers@ai.mit.edu
   From: "Stefan Monnier" <stefan.monnier@lia.di.epfl.ch>
   Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme,alt.lang.scheme.scsh
   Date: 4 Jan 1996 15:44:04 GMT

   I don't know for his personal reasons, but in my case there are a few:

   - every keystroke counts in interactive use
   - I don't really care if my script is 20 or 50 lines long, as long as it was
     easy to write and is easy to read.
   - I never use complex control structures in interactive use. Or when I use 
     them, I don't care as much whether it takes me 2 or 5 lines. I'd rather 
     have a nice than a terse syntax in this case.

Those interested might want to check out a paper I wrote sort of about these
issues:

    ftp://ftp-swiss.ai.mit.edu/pub/su/scsh/scsh-paper.ps
    A Scheme shell.
    To appear in the \emph{Journal of Lisp and Symbolic Computation}.
    Also available as Technical Report TR-635,
      Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT;
      Technical Report TR-94-10,
      Department of Computer Science, University of Hong Kong;
      and Personal Information Architecture Note 3 (April 1994),
      MIT Laboratory for Computer Science.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • programming languages vs. interactive command languages, Olin Shivers <=