scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...

from [Shriram Krishnamurthi] [Bookmark Link][Original]
To: scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...)
From: shriram@europa.cs.rice.edu (Shriram Krishnamurthi)
Date: 09 Jan 1996 19:05:51 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, Rice University
Reply-to: shriram@cs.rice.edu 
gunter@netcom2.netcom.com (Mike Gunter) said:

> I believe Haskell is worth checking out if you're designing a syntax

Haskell without the the meta-syntactic operations, possibly.
Certainly not with.

> (or any other aspect of a language, really.)

Them sound like fightin' words to me. (-:

'shriram
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: comma commands in batch mode, Brian D . Carlstrom
Next by Date:  Re: news group, Martin Cracauer
Previous by Thread:  Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...), spot
Next by Thread:  Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...), Olin Shivers
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]