scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...

To: scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...)
From: dummy@emf.net (Robert)
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:33:24 -0800
Organization: "emf.net" Quality Internet Access. (510) 704-2929 (Voice)
In article <DKvo0t.2oL.0.macbeth@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>,
 Jeff Dalton <jeff@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
 > In article <cbartley-0301961421440001@198.95.246.147> 
 > cbartley@macromedia.com (Curtis Bartley) writes:
 > 
 . . . For example:
 > >
 > >   > cd source
 > >
 > >Would get preprocessed to
 > >
 > >  > (cd "source")
 > 
 > I think that's a good idea.
 > 
 > FWIW, some Lisps (e.g. Lisp 1.5 and InterLisp) had a top-level that
 > worked in "evalquote" mode.  You'd type a function name, then a list
 > of arguments.  The arguments would not be evaluated.  In some of these
 > systems, you'd put parens around the arglist, but clearly that's not
 > necessary.  The Lisp Machine top-level may be an example.
 > 
 > So in a way, this idea goes back almost to the beginning.
 > 
 > -- jeff
 > 

Go a little farther, and you'll have Logo!

-- 
                           >> Fight the flat tax. <<
                  >> Support your local Planned Parenthood. <<
                    ** finger dummy@emf.net for PGP key **


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>