| To: | meta@harlequin.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...) |
| From: | Brent Benson <bwb@concentra.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Jan 1996 09:33:53 -0500 |
| Cc: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
# Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 13:04:10 GMT # From: meta@harlequin.co.uk (mathew) # # > One thing I've been thinking about lately is that (again, rightly # > or wrongly) people are willing to learn command languages that have # > a very different syntax from normal programming languages # # Absolutely. I expect my interactive command language to have different # syntax from the programming languages I use, because they serve very # different purposes. That may be so, but it sure would be nice to have a tighter integration between my command language and my scripting language than the Unix/DOS barrier of process and pipe. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...), mathew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cross-platform subset?, Cyber Surfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...), mathew |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Perl, English, syntax for Scheme and shells (was Re: scsh in scm ...), Curtis Bartley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |