| To: | lord@cygnus.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh? |
| From: | junio@twinsun.com (Jun Hamano) |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:25:41 -0800 |
| Cc: | markf@ai.mit.edu, scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu, schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu, gel@cygnus.com |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <lord@cygnus.com> writes:
Tom> I sat down with nm, grep, etags and emacs one day and worked it out.
Tom> To make the core of Tk language independent (or at least suitable for
Tom> Scheme) is at most a few weeks work. "Somewhere I even have a spec
Tom> on-line" (tm). Various people have already carried out approximations
Tom> of this.
Or can't we use pTk? The document claims that the author of pTk
has already stripped out Tcl dependence from Tk in order to
integrate it with perl, and the stripped Tk core is designed to
be language independent.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, Per Bothner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, James LewisMoss |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, Per Bothner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, James LewisMoss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |