scsh-users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?

To: lord@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?
From: junio@twinsun.com (Jun Hamano)
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:25:41 -0800
Cc: markf@ai.mit.edu, scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu, schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu, gel@cygnus.com
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <lord@cygnus.com> writes:

    Tom> I sat down with nm, grep, etags and emacs one day and worked it out.
    Tom> To make the core of Tk language independent (or at least suitable for
    Tom> Scheme) is at most a few weeks work.  "Somewhere I even have a spec
    Tom> on-line" (tm). Various people have already carried out approximations
    Tom> of this.

Or can't we use pTk?  The document claims that the author of pTk
has already stripped out Tcl dependence from Tk in order to
integrate it with perl, and the stripped Tk core is designed to
be language independent.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>