| To: | lord@cygnus.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh? |
| From: | Per Bothner <bothner@cygnus.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Dec 95 12:07:27 -0800 |
| Cc: | markf@ai.mit.edu, scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu, schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu, gel@cygnus.com |
> Will Ousterhout
> choose to fold changes into tk that remove the dependency on Tcl?
Quite possible, given the data point of a Tcl-less Tk for Java is in
the works and is supposed to be released "soon." Anyone who wants to
push this should definitely get Ousterhout's advice first.
--Per
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, Mark Friedman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, Jun Hamano |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, Mark Friedman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why not SCM as a base for scsh?, Jun Hamano |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |