| To: | jin@atype.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: benchmark |
| From: | Olin Shivers <shivers@clark.lcs.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 95 14:33:44 -0500 |
| Cc: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
| Reply-to: | shivers@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu |
Good question. It might be because bignum arithmetic in Scheme 48 is
implemented in Scheme. Both elk and scm do it in C. For this kind of thing,
I'd imagine *big* slowdown in moving to byte-codes. However, I'm no expert;
that is really a Scheme 48 question. Try the Scheme 48 mailing list.
-Olin
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | benchmark, Jin S. Choi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: benchmark, Bill Sommerfeld |
| Previous by Thread: | benchmark, Jin S. Choi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: benchmark, Bill Sommerfeld |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |