| To: | scsh@martigny.ai.mit.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | file-[not-]exists? |
| From: | shriram@cs.rice.edu (Shriram Krishnamurthi) |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Nov 1994 05:01:09 -0600 (CST) |
Page 32 of the scsh manual reports the following return values:
file-not-exists?
#t doesn't exist
#f exists
'search-denied unable to determine
and claims that file-exists? is implemented as the not of
file-not-exists?.
One would have preferred that the 'search-denied flag be propagated to
file-exists? too. It isn't clear that merging definite non-existence
with inability to determine existence is a win. This asymmetry seems
a little odd.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | two bugs: #! handling; nit in documentation structure., Bill Sommerfeld |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: porting question, assar |
| Previous by Thread: | two bugs: #! handling; nit in documentation structure., Bill Sommerfeld |
| Next by Thread: | EOF within block comment now reports error, Brian D. Carlstrom |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |