scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-yp 0.2 using packaging proposal

To: scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-yp 0.2 using packaging proposal
From: Eric Knauel <knauel@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Tue Mar 30 03:33:04 2004
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
On Tue 30 Mar 2004 12:58, Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> writes:

> Eric Knauel <knauel@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> This package contains code written in C and uses the reader for
>> .la-files to figure out the name of the shared library to load.  I
>> guess that this package is the first package to use that code.  Thus,
>> it's also a test for the packaging library.  
>> So, put it to the test! ;-)
>
> I tested it at work, where we have mostly Linux boxes with a Solaris
> server (acting as a NIS server, among other things). I'm happy to
> report that it installs and works flawlessly. (I didn't perform very
> sophsticated tests, just a few queries on our "passwd" table).

Good news. ;-)  Thanks for testing!

>> One (little) known problem: If you install the package for multiple
>> platforms, the second run of the install script will complain while
>> copying the scheme files because they are already there. I ought to
>> add a check for that case.
>
> Doesn't --non-shared-only help in that case?

Uhm, yes.  I wasn't aware of the fact that there is something like
--non-shared-only. 

-Eric
-- 
"Excuse me --- Di Du Du Duuuuh Di Dii --- Huh Weeeheeee" (Albert King)

Attachment: pgpRm0EAgrLYv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>