| To: | David Frese <dfrese@dfrese.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Upcoming release of the packaging proposal |
| From: | Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> |
| Date: | Sun Mar 21 06:10:02 2004 |
| Cc: | scsh-hackers scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Le 15 mars 04, à 16:42, David Frese a écrit : Only one little thing: The usage-screen speaks of install-prefix, where it means dest-dir. Hmm, not sure I know what you mean here. Do you mean that when --dest-dir is used I should include it in the path which I suggest to add to SCSH_LIB_DIRS? If that's what you mean, I'm not sure I agree. The thing is that when you use --dest-dir, the installation library does install the package there, but with the assumption that it will be moved to its final location (i.e. the one given by --prefix) before being used. (Most scsh packages will anyway be unusable if they are not moved, because of the absolute paths appearing in load.scm). Cheers, Michel. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] RC 2, Brian D. Carlstrom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Upcoming release of the packaging proposal, David Frese |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Upcoming release of the packaging proposal, David Frese |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Upcoming release of the packaging proposal, David Frese |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |