scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact

To: Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact
From: Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org>
Date: Tue Feb 17 08:40:00 2004
Cc: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:04:41PM +0100, Michel Schinz wrote:
> > Do you think it would be necessary to filter out the particular
> > options required by each sub-package?
>
> I'm afraid I don't really understand what you mean by this.

You propose that the parent-package should take the union of the
options of all the sub-packages. If sub-package A could take options
"foo" and "bar", and sub-package B could only take option "bar", then
should the parent-package avoid passing option "foo" to sub-package B?

-- 
Anthony Carrico


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>