| To: | Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact |
| From: | Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org> |
| Date: | Tue Feb 17 08:40:00 2004 |
| Cc: | scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 05:04:41PM +0100, Michel Schinz wrote: > > Do you think it would be necessary to filter out the particular > > options required by each sub-package? > > I'm afraid I don't really understand what you mean by this. You propose that the parent-package should take the union of the options of all the sub-packages. If sub-package A could take options "foo" and "bar", and sub-package B could only take option "bar", then should the parent-package avoid passing option "foo" to sub-package B? -- Anthony Carrico |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact, Michel Schinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact, Michel Schinz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact, Michel Schinz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-packages first contact, Michel Schinz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |