scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available

To: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available
From: "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@carlstrom.com>
Date: Tue Feb 3 12:28:16 2004
Cc: Andreas Bernauer <andreas.bernauer@gmx.de>, scsh hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Reply-to: "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@carlstrom.com>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Martin Gasbichler writes:
 > I'm not sure I understand what you mean: The test for rdynamic is new
 > but it now works *without* looking at __ELF__.

There seem to be TWO places that check for -rdynamic. I saw the one
below. I didn't realize, but this is probably the older one. The newer
one is probably the problem, but I can imagine the old one is
incomplete. It's just a warning, nothing serious.

-bri

dnl -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
AC_DEFUN(SCSH_ELF, [
  AC_MSG_CHECKING(for ELF)
  AC_CACHE_VAL(scsh_cv_elf,[
    touch conftest.c
    if ${CC} -v -o a.out conftest.c 2>&1 | grep -q __ELF__ ; then
      scsh_cv_elf=yes
    else
      scsh_cv_elf=no
    fi])
  AC_MSG_RESULT($scsh_cv_elf)
  if test $scsh_cv_elf = yes; then
    LDFLAGS=-rdynamic
  fi
  rm -f conftest.c a.out
])


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>