| To: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available |
| From: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@carlstrom.com> |
| Date: | Tue Feb 3 12:28:16 2004 |
| Cc: | Andreas Bernauer <andreas.bernauer@gmx.de>, scsh hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Reply-to: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@carlstrom.com> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Martin Gasbichler writes:
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean: The test for rdynamic is new
> but it now works *without* looking at __ELF__.
There seem to be TWO places that check for -rdynamic. I saw the one
below. I didn't realize, but this is probably the older one. The newer
one is probably the problem, but I can imagine the old one is
incomplete. It's just a warning, nothing serious.
-bri
dnl -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
AC_DEFUN(SCSH_ELF, [
AC_MSG_CHECKING(for ELF)
AC_CACHE_VAL(scsh_cv_elf,[
touch conftest.c
if ${CC} -v -o a.out conftest.c 2>&1 | grep -q __ELF__ ; then
scsh_cv_elf=yes
else
scsh_cv_elf=no
fi])
AC_MSG_RESULT($scsh_cv_elf)
if test $scsh_cv_elf = yes; then
LDFLAGS=-rdynamic
fi
rm -f conftest.c a.out
])
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available, Michel Schinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available, Martin Gasbichler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available, Martin Gasbichler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.6 beta available, Martin Gasbichler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |