David Frese <email@example.com> writes:
> I have no problems with that interface - it looks very good and
> usable, good work!
I'm glad to hear that, thanks.
> The only thing I want to note, is that the new configure module that
> Martin added to the 0.6-branch should be used instead of the extra
> one, because of the scsh include-dir. OK, not a big thing, but I
> noticed, that the previous (host) function returned some sort of
> canonical hostname like i386-linux on my machine, but the new module
> returns the one generated by configure, which is i686-pc-linux-gnu
> here. I'm not sure if this is a problem, or which is prefferable; I
> just wanted to mention it...
Indeed. I don't view this as a serious problem, as I think that the
packaging proposal will not be published before scsh 0.6.6 is out. So
we can just keep the current "configure.scm" file for now, just to
have something to make testing possible, and then simply forget about