scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: new version of install-lib

To: Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: new version of install-lib
From: David Frese <dfrese@dfrese.de>
Date: Sun Dec 21 17:06:09 2003
Cc: scsh-hackers hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Am Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:47:54 +0100 schrieb Michel Schinz (== "Michel"):

Michel> This new support for options subsumes the "optional-parts" which were
Michel> added by David, and I therefore removed explicit support for them (or,
Michel> to be precise, I didn't re-add it). This is the first source of
Michel> backward incompatibility, for which I apologise. David should be the
Michel> only affected, and since he is paid for that, I guess it doesn't
Michel> matter :-). No, seriously, if someone feels that optional parts *have*
Michel> to be reintroduced with the same interface as before, I can do it by
Michel> providing a small layer on top of what we have now.

I have no problems with that interface - it looks very good and
usable, good work!

The only thing I want to note, is that the new configure module that
Martin added to the 0.6-branch should be used instead of the extra
one, because of the scsh include-dir. OK, not a big thing, but I
noticed, that the previous (host) function returned some sort of
canonical hostname like i386-linux on my machine, but the new module
returns the one generated by configure, which is i686-pc-linux-gnu
here. I'm not sure if this is a problem, or which is prefferable; I
just wanted to mention it...

--
David


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>