| To: | Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: report and questions |
| From: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
| Date: | Tue Dec 2 07:31:00 2003 |
| Cc: | scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> writes: >>> The copied file and all directories created by this command have >>> their permissions set to PERMS which defaults to #o755. >> >> So PERMS is an integer? > > Yes. I used an integer because that's what scsh currently uses, but > maybe something more structured would be better. Is this one of the > things you plan to change in scsh 0.7 (i.e. have a real data type for > permissions)? Yes, even though this one is easy as S48's posix interface already has an interface for this that looks pretty reasonable. I don't mind PERMS being an integer but I think you should mention this explicitly. -- Martin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: report and questions, Michel Schinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] packaging proposal design issues, Michel Schinz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: report and questions, Michel Schinz |
| Next by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] packaging proposal design issues, Anthony Carrico |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |