scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions

To: Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions
From: Michael Sperber <sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Sun Nov 23 02:04:05 2003
Cc: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org> writes:

>> Since there is currently no packaging standard for Scheme48, I think
>> that it would make sense to install them at the same location as the
>> scsh libraries, yes.

Anthony> Are there any s48 users who don't use scsh? I wonder.

Yes.

Anthony> I'm not really familiar with what features are more advanced
Anthony> in s48 vs scsh anymore.

Quite a few.  Optimistic concurrency, most prominently.  (And there's
more stuff cooking.)

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>