| To: | Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions |
| From: | Michael Sperber <sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
| Date: | Sun Nov 23 02:04:05 2003 |
| Cc: | scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org> writes: >> Since there is currently no packaging standard for Scheme48, I think >> that it would make sense to install them at the same location as the >> scsh libraries, yes. Anthony> Are there any s48 users who don't use scsh? I wonder. Yes. Anthony> I'm not really familiar with what features are more advanced Anthony> in s48 vs scsh anymore. Quite a few. Optimistic concurrency, most prominently. (And there's more stuff cooking.) -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions, Anthony Carrico |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: report and questions, Michel Schinz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions, Anthony Carrico |
| Next by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal: report and questions, Michel Schinz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |